Etwas in Deutsch

Paragraph 336 oder § 336 ( §336 ) Starfbuchgesetz in Ägypten

The first trail against BEZNESS in Egypt of Gehad al sayed ismail tourist cheater in Egypt (Sharm AL Shaikh)

Penal Code provision (Article 336)"states that anyone who receives money by means of fraud or through making false pretences is punishable by imprisonment."

Viele Leute wollen, dass wir den ganzen Text in Deutsch übersetzen. Leider ist uns das zurzeit noch nicht möglich alles zu übersetzen.
aber hier sind paar Tipps:
Falls Sie eine solche Begegnung mit Btrüger gehabt haben.
Empfehlen wir ,
dass Sie erst mehrmals offizielle Anzeige (kein E-Mail , kein Fax nur schriftlich mit Rückschein ) an ägyptischen Botschaft, Toursit-Polizei (bzw. alle Behörden in Ägypten) und bei noch eine Anzeige—>Polzei-> Staatsanwalt in Deutschland (das hat nicht viel Bedeutung) nur um das Kopie der deutsche Anzeige , auch an Ägyptischen Botschaft zu senden) . Verweisen Sie in Ihre Anzeige auf § 336 Ägyptische Gesetzbuch. Achtung in der Anzeige müsse nur der Tatbestand stehen , nichts anderes erzählen (nur Geld ist weg, dass war’s).
Weiter : Warten auf Antwort.. Bitte noch keine Anwählte einschalten(Sinnlos und die Anwählte in Ägypten sind selber Betrüger).
Erst müssen die Behörden Stellungnahme machen , den wird Polizei oder der Staatsanwalt 8in Ägypten) die Rolle übernehmen , wenn man sie überzeugt haben. ab diesem Punkt braucht man einen Rechtsanwalt in Ägypten (Achtung nur einfache Anwahlt reicht, weil die Urteile sind alle vorläufig und ziehen in die lange) .
Vorsicht die gegen Rechtsanwälte werden Versuchen den Prozess Richtung Zivil-Gericht zu steuern, oder übersetzungen sind falsch etc . Das ist ein Fehler: Der Anwahlt muss beides beantragen: Straf-Gericht und Zivil-klage gleichzeitig. (das ist in Ägypten möglich).

Kommt jemanden mit der Masche die Übersetzung der Anzeige war nicht korrekt, dafür gibt es eine Urteil der besagt das die Tat ist bewisen also Übersetzung spielt keine Rolle.

Rechter in Ägypten sind sehr Gut, Gerichte (Mitarbeiter) sind aber das Gegenteil.
Alles dauert bis 3 Jahre, danach ist die Sache beendet.(Positive oder Negative).
Viel Glück

The first trail against BEZNESS in Egypt of Gehad al sayed ismail tourist cheater in Egypt (Sharm AL Shaikh)

see : http://my-pics2006.de.vu/

How to act against Frauding in Egypt

EXample : BEZNESS

Every one in Sharm Alsheikh and Hurgada

try to cheats you in your Holiday

they offer you a great projects to start a new life

CAUTION : they start to use you and making false pretences

no body will help you , but you can try to help your self with using the LOW

Penal Code provision (Article 336)

but becareful all of them will try to sell you

start with me to show the world that the EGYPTION must stop kiding

and frauding (cheats) people are coming to have holiday

read that

Paragraph 336 oder § 336 ( §336 ) Starfbuchgesetz in Ägypten

Penal Code provision (Article 336)
"states that anyone who receives money by means of fraud or through making false pretences is punishable by imprisonment."

The trail against one of the cheaters that cheats on Womens in Sharm El Sheikh in Egypt.
The trail was according to the penal code 336 Egypt / § 336 Ägypten .

Part I

the first part of the story read http://my-pics2006.de.vu/

Part II

The cheater had been arrested in the summer of 2006 while investigations were being carried out after reporting him to the Sharm police 2006 and was found for guilty on 01-2007 and on the second trail done on 06-2007 and on thierd trail on 2008 , but was on the large or on the run (escaped 2 years) ,

at least he becomes a new suspected trail on 08-2008 and got in custady for 30 days and he is now free again and do fraudlment again and again to the all tourist coming in Egypt for a holiday. So take care people this people are criminals.

he said that to The judges that he was not on the large or on the run , and he said to the The judges , that he was ill for tow years . he obtain a false medical papers to prov that.

But you know he paid for that to

the Story of his trail

he was reported to the police in Sharm on 2006 after he offered GW a dummy project and takes the money and escaped a way to his home town (down town) .

The police and prosecution decied to arrest him on his home town. And they ask him about the money , he told them i got that money for doing services and at the same time i am poor man and the tourist give me money for the services i have done and the rest ogf the money wa present to support me and my family.

the prosecution ask him , "can you told us you who gives a lot of money to a person like you as present .

The material presented by the prosecution to substantiate this charge relied heavily on the testimony of one of the defendants, Gehad al sayed ismail abu al maati, who had been employed first at the Hotel hauzer and later at Grand Rotana in Sharm al sheikh, who had been arrested in the summer of 2006 while investigations were being carried out, the defendant and subsequently convicted on fraud on german tourist according to § 336 egyption law and detain for up to four weeks pending investigation.

The prosecution also used as evednce of fraud the existence of some 4500 Euro on the paperes of Western Union Bank sharm al sheikh Egypte , Some days before his arrest, these papers was given throw the Western Union Bank in Sharm as a evidence that he takes that money and been deposited in second Bank Perues Bank in sharm , a second bank of the cheater Gehad al sayed Ismail (why he do that see the whole story later on this blog) and he confirmed in his testimony. During the trial, prosecution officials stated that he is guilty. However, the prosecution did not submit any evidence to support this assertion, yet it was accepted by the court as fact.
During the trial, the defendant found for fraudulent acts as guilty and that the prosecution have submit all evidence and accepted by the court as fact.

The judges rejected defense arguments that the material presented by the prosecution was insufficient to prove that fraud had been committed. They stated that the material evidence demonstrated that Gehad al sayed ismail ab almaati had used ruse and trickery in order to delude the injured party (the German Waomen) into believing that its funds had been used in accordance with the terms of the behoviuor of the .....

Among other things, they stated that this delusion was achieved through the submission of fake Among other things, the evedince stated that this delusion was achieved through the submission of fake papers about ng a false Health Center Location on Sharm as proof of expenditures .


The judges also stated that the evidence showed that Gehad al sayed isamil had transferred some of the funds obtained from the German Women into his personal accounts Pirus Bank.

On the question of the non-material evidence, the judges stated that this rested on the notion of criminal intent, and that this was proved on the basis of Gehad al sayed isamil knowledge that the funds in question were the property of another party and that he consciously proceeded to commit fraud.

Egyptian legislation requires that for the crime of fraud to be proved, it must be shown that it was perpetrated prior to the receipt of the funds in question.


The judges did address a related point raised by defense lawyers, namely that the contracts between the two parties were private civil contracts, and since the funding party had not submitted any complaints or made allegations of fraud, it was not incumbent upon the authorities to bring criminal charges.
The judges rejected this line of defense, stating that the crime of fraud was not among those crimes for which the General Prosecution requires prior authorization, application or complaint from the injured party in order to institute criminal proceedings. Those crimes requiring such authorization are clearly specified in Article 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the crime of fraud is not among them.39 As such, the judges argued, the General Prosecution had the authority to bring criminal charges, despite the fact that in a case involving fraud, the rights of the injured party are property rights. This was justified, they stated, because the crime of fraud can be detrimental to society as a whole if the principle of good intentions in financial transactions is not established. The fact that no complaint had been made by the GW did not, in their opinion, restrict the power of the prosecution from charging the defendants with fraud.

During the trial, the prosecution provided forensic evidence that it stated demonstrated that the signatures and handwriting on the relevant documents were those of the defendant. However, neither defendant was accorded the full rights to a fair trial in accordance with internationally accepted norms for fair trial, and as such they should be retried before an ordinary criminal court following such procedures, or released.

المادة 336 عقوبات مصرى أن تتوافر الوسائل الاحتيالية توحى بصدق ادعاء الجانى كى يتوصل إلى الاستيلاء على أموال الغير. يكفى . يبلغ مبلغ الطرق الاحتيالية إذا كان مصحوبا بأعمال مادية وخارجية تحمل المجنى عليه على الاعتقاد بصحته. ولذلك فإن جريمة النصب تتحقق بمجرد تأكيد صحتها حتى تأثر بها المجنى عليه2. كما أن المادة 336 تحدد أهدافا معينة يتعين أن يتوافر إحداها كى تقوم جريمة النصب، وأهمها الإيهام بوجود مشروع كاذب أو الإيهام بوجود واقعة مزورة أو إحداث الأمل بحصول ربح وهمى. علاوة على ذلك فإن النصب يتطلب أفعالا ايجابية

حكم على شاب من قصاصين الشرق الحسنية بمحافظة الشرقية نصب على مسثمرة أجنبية بمبلغ 4500 يورو بالحبس وأكد الحكم ضده مرتين وقام بالفرار من العادلة . ...